Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 -- the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, or MiCA -- has been fully applicable since 30 December 2024. Every crypto-asset service provider (CASP) operating in the EU must now hold a MiCA authorization. The maximum Article 143(3) transitional period ended on 1 July 2026.

This article covers what the regulation actually requires: the ten service types defined under MiCA, the capital thresholds tied to each, the governance structure your NCA will expect, the application process and timeline, and a comparison of five popular licensing jurisdictions. Everything references the regulation directly -- no paraphrasing of paraphrases.

Grandfathering has ended

As of 10 July 2026, an EU CASP without MiCA authorization should be in orderly exit mode. ESMA expects unauthorized CASPs to stop onboarding new EU clients, refrain from opening new accounts, cease marketing and solicitation, and limit services to actions needed to sell or transfer crypto-assets, reallocate assets, or close positions. CySEC's 27 February 2026 application deadline was the Cyprus filing deadline and is now historical.


What are the ten crypto-asset services under MiCA?

MiCA Article 3(1)(16) defines ten crypto-asset services. Your authorization application must specify which services you intend to provide, because capital requirements, governance obligations, and operational rules differ by service type.

  1. Custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients
  2. Operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets
  3. Exchange of crypto-assets for funds (fiat on/off ramp)
  4. Exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
  5. Execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
  6. Placing of crypto-assets (marketing on behalf of an offeror)
  7. Reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets
  8. Providing advice on crypto-assets
  9. Providing portfolio management on crypto-assets
  10. Providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients

Most CASPs will apply for authorization covering multiple services. A typical exchange, for example, would need authorization for custody (service 1), operating a trading platform (service 2), exchange for funds (service 3), exchange for other crypto-assets (service 4), and execution of orders (service 5). Your capital requirement is determined by the highest-threshold service in your application.


What are the capital requirements by service type?

MiCA Article 67 and Annex IV establish three capital tiers. CASPs must maintain permanent minimum own funds at all times, composed of Common Equity Tier 1 items as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.

Capital tier Minimum own funds Services covered
Class 3 EUR 150,000 Operation of a trading platform (includes all Class 1 & 2 services)
Class 2 EUR 125,000 Custody and administration, exchange for funds, exchange for other crypto-assets (includes Class 1 services)
Class 1 EUR 50,000 Advice, portfolio management, execution of orders, placing, transfer services, reception and transmission of orders
Higher-of test

Article 67(1) requires CASPs to hold own funds equal to the higher of: (a) the permanent minimum capital from Annex IV shown above, or (b) one quarter of the prior year's fixed overheads, reviewed annually. For a CASP with EUR 800,000 in annual fixed overheads, the one-quarter test yields EUR 200,000 -- exceeding even the highest Annex IV threshold. Plan accordingly.

What counts as own funds

Own funds must consist of Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) instruments as defined in Articles 26-30 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the Capital Requirements Regulation). In practice, this means:

Client funds held in custody, crypto-asset reserves, and subordinated debt do not count toward own funds. These are separate safeguarding requirements under Article 70.


What are the MiCA governance requirements?

MiCA Articles 68-69 set out governance obligations. NCAs assess governance during the application process and monitor it on an ongoing basis. This is not a checkbox exercise -- NCAs have rejected applications on governance grounds.

Fit-and-proper test for management

Article 68 requires that members of the management body are of sufficiently good repute and possess appropriate knowledge, skills, and experience to perform their duties. The NCA assesses this individually for each director and senior manager. In practice:

Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)

CASPs must appoint a dedicated MLRO responsible for AML/CFT compliance. This is a named individual, not a department or an outsourced function. The MLRO must:

Some NCAs -- including CySEC -- require the MLRO to be locally resident. Confirm this with your specific NCA before submitting your application.

Compliance function

Article 68(9) requires CASPs to establish and maintain a permanent and effective compliance function. The compliance function must be independent from the business lines it monitors. For smaller CASPs, the compliance officer and MLRO roles can overlap, but both functions must be formally documented.

Internal audit

CASPs must have an internal audit function that is separate from the compliance function. The internal audit function reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls, risk management, and governance arrangements. Smaller CASPs may outsource internal audit to a third party, but the management body retains ultimate responsibility.

Conflicts of interest policy

Article 72 requires CASPs to maintain, operate, and publish a conflicts of interest policy. This must identify conflicts arising from the CASP's activities and set out procedures to prevent, manage, and disclose them. Particular attention is required when the CASP operates a trading platform and also provides execution or custody services.

Board composition tip

NCAs expect the board to own the risk profile and strategic direction of the CASP, to understand the specific crypto services provided, and to have enough independence to challenge founders and executives. A two-person board consisting of co-founders with identical backgrounds will raise questions. Build a board with complementary expertise: crypto/tech, legal/compliance, and finance/risk.


What is the MiCA application process and timeline?

MiCA Articles 62-63 govern the CASP authorization process. You submit your application to the National Competent Authority (NCA) of the EU member state where your registered office is located. There is no option to apply to a different member state's NCA without establishing a legal entity there.

Step 1: Choose your NCA

Your NCA is determined by where you incorporate. Common choices include:

Once authorized, your license passports across all 27 EU/EEA member states. You do not need separate authorization in each country -- you notify your home NCA, which informs the host NCA.

Step 2: Prepare your application package

Article 62 specifies the documentation required. The exact forms vary by NCA, but every application must include:

  1. Business plan -- services to be provided, target markets, projected volumes, revenue model
  2. Governance arrangements -- organizational chart, board composition, reporting lines, fit-and-proper documentation for each director and senior manager
  3. Proof of capital -- audited evidence of own funds meeting Article 67 thresholds
  4. AML/CFT policies -- customer due diligence procedures, transaction monitoring, MLRO designation, risk assessment
  5. Operational resilience -- ICT security policies, business continuity plan, disaster recovery procedures
  6. Complaints handling procedure -- documented process for client complaints
  7. Outsourcing arrangements -- details and contracts for any outsourced functions (custody, compliance, IT)
  8. Conflicts of interest policy -- per Article 72
  9. Safeguarding arrangements -- how client funds and crypto-assets are segregated and protected
  10. Insurance or comparable guarantee -- where applicable under Article 67(6)
Common rejection reasons

Incomplete applications are the primary cause of delays and rejections. Based on early ESMA peer review data, the most frequent issues are:

  • Missing or insufficient fit-and-proper documentation for board members
  • AML/CFT policies that are generic templates rather than tailored to the CASP's specific services and risk profile
  • Business plans lacking financial projections or risk analysis
  • Governance structures without clear separation between compliance and business functions
  • No evidence of ICT security testing or third-party audit

Step 3: Completeness check and assessment

Once submitted, the application follows a statutory timeline defined in Article 63:

In practice, from initial submission to final authorization, expect 3 to 6 months for a well-prepared application. Poorly prepared applications can take 9 to 12 months due to multiple rounds of NCA questions and resubmissions.

Step 4: ESMA notification

After granting authorization, the NCA notifies ESMA, which maintains the public register of authorized CASPs. Your authorization is valid from the date of the NCA's decision, and passporting rights begin once the notification process is complete.


What are the ongoing obligations after authorization?

Authorization is not the end of the process. MiCA imposes continuous obligations that NCAs monitor through regular reporting, inspections, and supervisory engagement.


Which EU jurisdiction should you apply in?

All MiCA authorizations carry the same legal weight and passport across the EU. But processing times, costs, local requirements, and regulatory culture differ significantly between NCAs. Here is a practical comparison of five popular jurisdictions for CASP licensing.

Factor Cyprus (CySEC) Malta (MFSA) Lithuania (BoL) Netherlands (AFM) Germany (BaFin)
Processing time 3-5 months 3-6 months 3-5 months 4-6 months 6-9 months
Application fee Varies by service Varies by service ~EUR 2,500 Varies by service Varies by complexity
Annual supervision fee Based on turnover Based on turnover 0.6% of gross profits (min EUR 3,000) Based on turnover Based on turnover
Corporate tax rate 12.5% 5% effective 15% 25.8% ~30% (combined)
Application language English / Greek English / Maltese English / Lithuanian English / Dutch German (primarily)
Local substance Local office + directors required Local office + directors required Local office + at least 1 director Local office + directors required Full local establishment
Crypto regulatory experience Pre-MiCA CASP regime since 2021 VFA Act since 2018 VASP registration since 2020 Crypto registration since 2020 Crypto custody license since 2020
Transition status Ended 1 July 2026; 27 Feb filing deadline passed Ended 1 July 2026 Ended 1 July 2026 Ended mid-2025 Ended 1 July 2026

A few practical notes on jurisdiction selection:

Substance matters

Every NCA requires local substance -- a registered office, at least part of the management body resident in the member state, and operational staff. MiCA authorization is not a "brass plate" license. If your entire team is in Singapore and you incorporate a shell in Lithuania, the Bank of Lithuania will reject your application. NCAs share information with ESMA, so regulatory arbitrage strategies are increasingly transparent.


What is the estimated total cost of MiCA authorization?

The minimum capital requirement is not your only cost. Budget for the full picture:

Cost component Estimated range Notes
Minimum own funds EUR 50,000 - 150,000 Locked as capital; depends on service type (Annex IV)
Legal and advisory fees EUR 50,000 - 200,000 Application drafting, policy writing, NCA liaison
Compliance setup EUR 30,000 - 100,000 AML software, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring
Application fee (NCA) EUR 2,500 - 25,000 Varies significantly by jurisdiction and service scope
Governance (board, MLRO) EUR 50,000 - 150,000/year Non-executive directors, local MLRO salary
ICT and security audit EUR 15,000 - 50,000 Penetration testing, DORA compliance assessment
Insurance (if applicable) EUR 10,000 - 50,000/year Professional indemnity; Article 67(6) alternative

Total first-year cost estimate: EUR 200,000 to EUR 700,000+, depending on service scope, jurisdiction, and whether you build compliance infrastructure in-house or outsource it. The capital requirement is often the smallest line item.


Frequently asked questions

How much capital do I need for a MiCA CASP license?

MiCA requires permanent minimum capital of EUR 50,000 for advisory, portfolio management, and execution services; EUR 125,000 for custody and exchange services; and EUR 150,000 for operating a trading platform. The highest applicable tier applies if you offer multiple service types. You must also hold at least one quarter of prior-year fixed overheads if that amount exceeds the minimum threshold (MiCA Article 67, Annex IV).

How long does the MiCA CASP application process take?

Once your NCA confirms the application is complete, the statutory assessment period is 25 working days for completeness review plus up to 40 business days for the substantive assessment, extendable by 20 days. In practice, total processing from first submission to authorization typically takes 3-6 months, depending on jurisdiction and application quality.

Can I passport a MiCA CASP license to other EU countries?

Yes. A MiCA authorization granted by any EU member state NCA allows you to provide crypto-asset services across all 27 EU/EEA member states through passporting. You notify your home NCA, which then informs the host member state NCA. No separate authorization is needed in each country.

What happened to the MiCA grandfathering period for existing CASPs?

The maximum MiCA transitional period ended on 1 July 2026. As of 10 July 2026, an EU CASP without MiCA authorization should not operate business-as-usual: ESMA expects no new EU client onboarding, no new accounts, no marketing or solicitation, and services limited to actions needed for orderly exit, asset transfer, reallocation, or closing positions. CySEC's 27 February 2026 application deadline is now historical.

Which NCA jurisdiction should I choose for my MiCA CASP license?

The choice depends on your business model, operational presence, and language capabilities. Cyprus (CySEC) and Lithuania (Bank of Lithuania) are popular for processing speed and cost efficiency. Malta (MFSA) has deep crypto regulatory experience. The Netherlands (AFM) and Germany (BaFin) offer strong reputational signaling but longer processing times and higher costs. All MiCA licenses passport across the EU regardless of home jurisdiction.


Bottom line

Getting a MiCA CASP license is not a form-filling exercise. It is a comprehensive regulatory assessment of your capital adequacy, governance structure, operational resilience, and compliance infrastructure. The capital thresholds (EUR 50K-150K) are the easy part. The governance, AML/CFT, and ICT requirements are where most applications succeed or fail.

Start with the right jurisdiction for your business. Build governance before you apply -- it takes months to recruit a qualified board and MLRO. Budget for the real cost, which is multiples of the minimum capital. And do not rely on grandfathering as a cushion: the maximum transition ended on 1 July 2026, and unauthorized CASPs should now be in orderly exit mode unless and until authorized.

If your CASP handles custody, exchange, or transfer services, your compliance infrastructure needs to include restrictive-measures screening and alignment with EBA guidelines on restrictive measures from day one. These are not post-authorization nice-to-haves -- they are conditions of authorization.

Building your CASP compliance stack?

Take our 2-minute self-check based on EBA GL/2024/15 requirements. See where your sanctions screening, audit trail, and governance stand before your NCA inspection.

Read the regulatory guides →